VEYA: Deep Dives
The Virtual Early Years Advisor (VEYA)©
What is a Deep Dive?
VEYA:Deep Dives are very different to self-evaluation questions and audits.
Deep Dives use a supported self-assessment approach which enables leadership teams to:
The objectivity comes from the framework that sits behind VEYA.
Once an audit is complete, we’ll turn your responses into a detailed report which uses a red, amber, green and dark green traffic light system to highlight your strengths and areas for development.
Most reports will contain some red or amber statements, so we always recommend actions that can be taken to strengthen your approach within your report. We also provide an understanding of why each area needs to be developed which will help to broaden and deepen professional knowledge.
Keeping All Children Safe and Protecting Vulnerable Children is the first module in this series.
We advise that this module be undertaken before any of the others as we need to satisfy ourselves that we can identify vulnerable children at the earliest opportunity and take swift and appropriate actions to keep them safe. In addition, we will want to be able to demonstrate that our child protection and safeguarding arrangements are rigorous and consistent during an inspection.
Recruitment and suitable people
Regulation and legislation
Child protection and safeguarding practices
Accidents and incidents
Attendance
Deep Dives have been developed using grounded theory research which is a qualitative research method that draws new theories from the iterative collection and analysis of real-world data.
In this context, that means that we have:
- interviewed large numbers of early years leaders and practitioners about specific aspects of practice and provision,
- mapped their commentaries to legislative requirements, research and inspection documents,
- compared commentaries to identify common and contrasting data,
- and used that data to broaden and refine our understanding of specific areas of practice and provision.
That process has been repeated many times until we have been able to identify common characteristics that create the conditions for exemplary practice and highly effective systems and processes.
Interviews with leaders and practitioners have also helped us to understand where systems, processes and practice are less effective, enabling us to create a range of best-fit statements that reflect current practice.
The depth of each unit exceeds all other quality assurance materials, advice and guidance currently available.
What types of provision have informed this research?
We have undertaken hundreds of hours of interviews which have included: